Keyword summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catastrophizing results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 729 hits. Analysis detected 3,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (13,293 of 37,536 keywords). This Catastrophizing is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Catastrophizing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠65%Catastrophizing (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos