Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Law results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 885 hits . Analysis detected 7,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,017 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (30,464 of 34,502 keywords). This California Law is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. California Law
Keyword details
Total words: 13,017
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst