BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 201 faulty-reasoning hits from 507 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Actor and comedian Bill Cosby returns to the courtroom after a break with his spokesman Andrew Wyatt at the Montgomery County Courthouse, during his sexual assault trial sentencing in Norristown, Pennsylvania, U.S. 
September 24, 2018. 
(Photo by David Maialetti-Pool/Getty Images) 
A California jury awarded a woman named Donna Motsinger millions on Monday after finding Bill Cosby liable for a 1972 sexual assault. 
Motsinger is currently 84 years old. 
At the time of the assault in 1972, she was in her 30s and working as a restaurant server in Sausalito, California. 
The jury found the 88-year-old comedian liable for drugging and sexually assaulting Motsinger in 1972. 
They initially awarded her $19.25 million, $17.5 million for past suffering and $1.75 million for future emotional distress. 
However, just hours later, following a second phase of deliberations to determine if Cosby acted with “malice,” the jury added an additional $40 million in punitive damages, bringing the total to $59.25 million. 
In the complaint, filed in 2023, a copy of which was provided by Panish Shea Ravipudi LLP, the law firm representing her, Motsinger had alleged that Cosby drugged and raped her in 1972. 
According to the suit, Cosby went to the restaurant where Motsinger worked in Sausalito, California, every day for a week. 
While Motsinger was returning home, Cosby followed and pulled up next to her, inviting her to a show he was performing. 
He later picked her up from her house in a limousine and gave her a glass of wine. 
Upon arriving to the theater, she began to feel sick and Cosby gave her what she believed to be aspirin. 
However, she quickly lost consciousness, later waking up at home in her underwear  unaware how she got there. 
“She [then] knew she had been drugged and raped by Bill Cosby,” the suit said. 
Cosby has faced a plethora of sexual assault allegations in recent years, and he served three years in prison on a sexual assault charge until the conviction was overturned in 2021 for procedural reasons, according to the NYT. 
In a subsequent separate civil trial, the jury found him liable for sexually abusing then-16-year-old Judy Huth in 1975. 
NYT notes that California, along with other states, have changed laws regarding the statute of limitations in sexual assault suits, increasing the time accusers have to come forward, which allowed Motsinger to file her case. 
“It has been 54 years to get justice, and I know it’s not complete for the rest of the women, but i hope it helps them a little bit,” she said at the courthouse. 
The outlet reported that Cosby did not testify at the trial and that his lawyer said they will be pursuing an appeal. 
Cosby has denied all allegations, and he argues that in every case, all sexual encounters were consensual. 
In the deposition, Cosby noted that he remembered being in the limo with Motsinger, but he could not recall if they had sex or not, according to NYT. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 4.4%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Addie Davis: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 3.6%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 9.3%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 3.9%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.2%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 8.4%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.3%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 4.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 3.0%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 3.1%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.6%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 4.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.9%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.7%Addie Davis: 10.5%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion6.7%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.8%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 11.2%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy11.2%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.5%Addie Davis: 5.7%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice7.5%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.9%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

507 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.7%attributed speech473writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageDonna Motsinger • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donna Motsinger

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words100% of attributed speech15% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%Donna Motsinger: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.