Keyword summary
⁠17%6 analyzed articles/videos5,782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cal Fire results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 2,225 hits. Analysis detected 10,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,982 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (35,842 of 37,533 keywords). This Cal Fire is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Cal Fire
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠5%Cal Fire (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,982
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles19K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos