Keyword summary
⁠50%4 analyzed articles/videos2,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Britney Spears results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 2,308 hits. Analysis detected 9,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,969 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (22,698 of 36,715 keywords). This Britney Spears is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Britney Spears
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠39%Britney Spears (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,969
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos