Keyword summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These British Royal Family results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 896 hits . Analysis detected 7,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,843 of 37,536 keywords). This British Royal Family is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. British Royal Family
Keyword details
Total words: 4,148
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst