Keyword summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 7,524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Board Of Aldermen results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 2,783 hits . Analysis detected 24,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,797 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,478 of 37,536 keywords). This Board Of Aldermen is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Board Of Aldermen
Keyword details
Total words: 29,797
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles29.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst