STLPR0%

Interim St. Louis sheriff moves budget around to do medical transports for jail 6%

By Chad Davis0%

5/13/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 200 faulty-reasoning hits from 420 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (20,774 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the article peer group.

St. 
Louis Sheriff's Office officials said they've been able to provide more medical transports from the city jail thanks to a new overtime budget. 
Previous administrations said staffing shortages prevented them from providing transportation for medical services. 
Interim Sheriff John Hayden Jr. discussed the department's budget proposal for the next fiscal year with the Board of Aldermen's Budget and Public Employees Committee on Monday. 
The board is hearing from all city departments this month. 
Hayden said the department moved money to an overtime budget to pay workers to assist with hospital details and transporting detainees. 
“What we've done this time was we've asked for $50,000 ahead of time, kind of anticipating the ongoing need for being able to call people from home,” Hayden said. 
The lapse in medical transportation was one of the chief criticisms against former Sheriff Alfred Montgomery. 
The Board of Aldermen passed legislation last year requiring the department to provide transports after sheriff's lawyers questioned if it was a mandated duty. 
The state attorney general's office also argued that Montgomery was not fulfilling his duties when it sued to oust him from office. 
When asked about the relationship between the sheriff and the Department of Corrections, Hayden said it's going well and that the sheriff's office is doing what it can with the available resources. 
“We're managing, there's times when it's really tough,” Hayden said during the meeting. 
“We are willing to go down to the wire.” 
The office created the overtime budget to assist the corrections division. 
Hayden said he wants to return to the board at a later date to discuss more efficient methods to handle hospital details and hopes to set up hospital wards for detainees who need medical care. 
Alderman Matt Devoti said Monday that he was pleased by the steps the office has made since Hayden was named sheriff last October. 
The sheriff's office's requested budget also includes expenses for a reworked taser contract split up into a five-year period. 
“That's an increase of approximately $107,000 year [over] year,” Hayden said. 
A spokesperson for the sheriff said the $12.7 million budget is subject to change based on a pay bill that would raise deputy salaries. 
Hayden said the department is short 31 deputies. 
A spokesperson for the office said it's trying to hire 33 full-time equivalent workers but only 11 have been confirmed by judges so far. 
The department is requesting an additional full-time employee in the cashier's office. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.2%Chad Davis: 4.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias15.2%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Chad Davis: 9.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias3.8%This article: 7.6%Chad Davis: 2.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.2%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority5.2%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 9.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.5%Chad Davis: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.6%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.1%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote2.1%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

420 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers60%attributed speech170writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageLouis Sheriff's Office • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Hayden Jr. • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Hayden Jr. • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBoard of Aldermen • 24 words • 0.0% coveragestate attorney general's office • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Hayden Jr. • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Hayden Jr. • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Hayden Jr. • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Hayden Jr. • 35 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Devoti • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Hayden Jr. • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Hayden Jr. • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words9.2% of attributed speech9.4% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.