Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Budget results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Slippery Slope , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 396 hits . Analysis detected 3,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,974 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (31,030 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis Budget is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. St Louis Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 6,974
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst