Keyword summary
83% 21 analyzed articles/videos 20,619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Billionaires results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 11,196 hits . Analysis detected 104,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 82,842 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (21,849 of 34,727 keywords). This Billionaires is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Billionaires
Keyword details
Total words: 82,842
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score21 analyzed articles82.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst