Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill-Maher results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 2,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (5,792 of 34,833 keywords). This Bill-Maher is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Bill-Maher
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
84%Bill-Maher (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.1%14.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate