Mediaite70%

‘So Stupid!’ Bill Maher Rips Artists Ditching Kennedy Center Performances Over Trump Name Flap 67%

By Joe DePaolo60%

7/20/2026, 1:02:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 738 faulty-reasoning hits from 340 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.2% and a BS Rank of 67% (6,794 of 20,473 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the article peer group.

Bill Maher criticized artists who have canceled performances at the Kennedy Center over the efforts to put President Donald Trump’s name on the building . 
In an extended, online-exclusive clip from Maher’s interview on ABC’s This Week Sunday, the HBO Real Time host  who was honored at the Kennedy Center in late June with the prestigious Mark Twain prize  called out the performers who have dropped out because of Trump. 
“You’ve seen all these people that once he took over the Kennedy Center refused to be there, dropped out of performances,” ABC’s Jonathan Karl told Maher. 
“That’s so stupid!” 
Maher replied. 
“First of all, you’re just giving him the victory. 
He doesn’t own the Kennedy Center. 
He doesn’t own comedy. 
Life goes on. 
That’s the message I would send.” 
Maher explained that he wasn’t going to let the specter of Trump hang over a ceremony paying tribute to him. 
“I’ve always watched the Kennedy Center honors,” Maher said. 
“This is kind of like that but for one guy. 
It’s the same thing. 
You’re up in the box, you know, it’s awesome. 
It’s great, and it’s rare, and it’s America. 
And he doesn’t own that either, you know. 
The idea that you people who just let him ruin everything…” 
The ceremony took place shortly after a federal judge ordered Trump’s name removed from the building, and a tarp was put up  which officials have said was necessary for maintenance  but critics claim was done just to obstruct visitors from seeing the name of John F. 
Kennedy. 
Maher saluted the move from a pure comedy standpoint. 
“It’s like, checkmate!” 
Maher said. 
“You can’t even think like he does in certain ways, like the tarp on over the name. 
I wouldn’t have even thought to go there, and yet you  unique man that you are  thought of it… It’s hysterical!” 
Watch above, via ABC. 
(The relevant portion begins at roughly the 2:00 mark.) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.6%Joe DePaolo: 3.5%Mediaite: 4.9%Confirmation Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Joe DePaolo: 3.2%Mediaite: 3.6%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 2.9%Joe DePaolo: 1.1%Mediaite: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.3%Mediaite: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Joe DePaolo: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.2%This article: 12.6%Joe DePaolo: 13.7%Mediaite: 9.1%Framing Effect12.6%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.8%Joe DePaolo: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.4%Status Quo Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Joe DePaolo: 0.6%Mediaite: 1.2%Optimism Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 2.3%Mediaite: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 40.0%Joe DePaolo: 14.7%Mediaite: 14.8%Negativity Bias40.0%This article: 6.8%Joe DePaolo: 0.2%Mediaite: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.9%Mediaite: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.8%Mediaite: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.1%Mediaite: 2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.0%This article: 13.8%Joe DePaolo: 3.2%Mediaite: 1.4%Halo Effect13.8%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.1%Mediaite: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Joe DePaolo: 0.5%Mediaite: 2.3%Recency Bias2.6%This article: 7.4%Joe DePaolo: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.6%Primacy Effect7.4%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Joe DePaolo: 3.9%Mediaite: 3.7%Ad Hominem10.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.8%Joe DePaolo: 1.5%Mediaite: 3.6%Appeal to Authority13.8%This article: 2.6%Joe DePaolo: 1.4%Mediaite: 2.4%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.2%Mediaite: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.6%Joe DePaolo: 6.4%Mediaite: 7.5%Hasty Generalization12.6%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.5%Mediaite: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 23.5%Joe DePaolo: 10.2%Mediaite: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion23.5%This article: 2.6%Joe DePaolo: 1.8%Mediaite: 1.5%Begging the Question2.6%This article: 14.1%Joe DePaolo: 2.3%Mediaite: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.1%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.6%Joe DePaolo: 2.2%Mediaite: 2.8%Anecdotal2.6%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.5%Joe DePaolo: 1.7%Mediaite: 2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.5%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Joe DePaolo: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground2.4%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.6%Joe DePaolo: 3.0%Mediaite: 3.2%Unattributed Quote7.6%This article: 0.6%Joe DePaolo: 2.3%Mediaite: 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 3.2%Joe DePaolo: 7.1%Mediaite: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice3.2%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.1%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 1.2%Mediaite: 2.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe DePaolo: 0.2%Mediaite: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Joe DePaolo: 2.2%Mediaite: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.2%

340 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers47%attributed speech181writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageJonathan Karl • 26 words • 100.0% coverageBill Maher • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 4 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 10 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 4 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 8 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 17 words • 0.0% coverageBill Maher • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jonathan Karl

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words16% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jonathan Karl: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Jonathan Karl: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.1 ptsWriter: 1.1%Jonathan Karl: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.