Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Controversy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 2,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,718 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,088 of 15,769 topics). This Political Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Political Controversy
Topic details
Total words: 1,718
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.6%17.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.9%22.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos