Keyword summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atlanta Braves results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,079 hits . Analysis detected 5,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,425 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (28,041 of 37,536 keywords). This Atlanta Braves is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Atlanta Braves
Keyword details
Total words: 7,425
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst