Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ariana Grande results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 2,702 hits. Analysis detected 20,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,336 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (13,298 of 37,536 keywords). This Ariana Grande is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Ariana Grande
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠65%Ariana Grande (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos