Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Thompson results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 2,343 hits . Analysis detected 10,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,016 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,425 of 6,628 authors). This Stephen Thompson is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Stephen Thompson
Author details
Total words: 8,016
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.7% 19.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.5% 8.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 29.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 19.7%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst