Keyword summary
35% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alicia Keys results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 2,459 hits . Analysis detected 12,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,045 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (30,855 of 37,398 keywords). This Alicia Keys is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Alicia Keys
Keyword details
Total words: 17,045
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst