Keyword summary
⁠26%6 analyzed articles/videos3,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Ethics results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 2,037 hits. Analysis detected 17,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,800 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (27,716 of 37,536 keywords). This Ai Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Ai Ethics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠27%Ai Ethics (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos