Keyword summary
68% 6 analyzed articles/videos 8,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Affirmative Action results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 5,432 hits . Analysis detected 33,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,558 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,103 of 35,199 keywords). This Affirmative Action is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Affirmative Action
Keyword details
Total words: 36,558
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles36.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst