Keyword summary
42% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Smith results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 3,205 hits . Analysis detected 27,623 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,022 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,455 of 35,718 keywords). This Adam Smith is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Adam Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 26,022
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles26K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst