Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Neal results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 1,325 hits . Analysis detected 6,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,684 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,909 of 6,628 authors). This Will Neal is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group. Will Neal
Author details
Total words: 4,684
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.2% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.3% 28.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.2% 16.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.9% 24.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst