Keystone Kash’s Girlfriend Humiliated Before Concert Even Starts 72%

By Will Neal0%

6/25/2026, 10:42:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 1,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 660 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (6,046 of 21,204 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the article peer group.

FBI Director Kash Patel’s girlfriend failed to drum up much enthusiasm at a poorly attended Donald Trump rally in D.C. before belting out the national anthem. 
“Oh, no… country music?” 
one attendee told CNN when asked whether she was looking forward to watching singer Alexis Wilkins, 27, perform at the president’s Great American State Fair on Wednesday. 
“Well, I think the Army band, and the choirs, they’re gonna be really good,” the woman added. 
Wilkins, who started dating Patel, 46, in early 2023, is a Nashville-based aspiring country music singer who is yet to have a single track rack up more than a few hundred thousand streams on Spotify. 
She announced she’d landed the D.C. gig just one day earlier. 
Online reviews of her actual performance weren’t much kinder. 
“Would have preferred Kash Patel!” 
one user wrote. 
“She sounds like A DEAD CAT!!!!!” 
another added. 
“Hello, D.C. police. 
I’d like to report a murder,” a third said. 
“Yes, someone has viciously murdered the national anthem.” 
Another user said it was “embarrassing for America,” while a fifth asked: “Wasn’t Milli Vanilli available?” 
The State Fair was marred even before it began after several headlined artists pulled out ahead of time, with many saying they didn’t want to be associated with something so “political.” 
Pop duo Milli Vanilli, famously stripped of a Grammy in 1990 after it emerged that they had not sung a word on their breakthrough album, were one of the acts to walk away from the event, describing it as a “circus.” 
Users in the comments section under Wilkins’ announcement that she’d been booked for the fair were quick to note quite how last-minute the change had been, and some suggested her relationship with Patel was likely a factor. 
“Does having the FBI director’s girlfriend getting paid by the taxpayers to perform violate federal ethics laws?” 
right-wing reporter Sara Higdon posted. 
“You’re telling me Kash didn’t pull any strings with Trump,” one person added. 
“Yeeeeah ok, whatever you say.” 
“More stealing of tax payer money so you and your moronic incompetent boyfriend can participate in kiss that big orange clowns a–,” a third person said. 
“A great honor to get asked when they couldn’t find anybody else lol,” a fourth wrote. 
Wilkins wasn’t taking it lying down. 
“Let’s just get a few things straight, because this is long overdue,” she wrote in a furious riposte to Higdon’s initial post, insisting that she’d had a “successful career in both music and commentary/strategy” for years. 
She went on to say that she’d been “invited to sing this anthem on my own accord,” that she was not “accepting payment for this great honor,” and that neither the event nor any of the others under Trump’s Freedom250 efforts to mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence was being funded by taxpayers. 
NOTUS previously reported that the Trump-created nonprofit behind the celebrations has received approximately $80 million in taxpayer funds. 
“I’m no longer accepting false narratives and total sham accusations that diminish my hard work and earned accomplishments, so please expect this kind of response to continue,” Wilkins added. 
Turnout at the state fair was arguably lower than Wilkins may have hoped at an event that might otherwise have boosted her limited online streams. 
Trump even used his own appearance at the sparsely attended Wednesday event to awkwardly beg MAGA fans to turn out in better numbers for his “Tribute to America” rally on July 4 on the National Mall. 
“Your favorite president will be speaking, so please show up,” the president said, in comments echoing Jeb Bush’s entreaty for a room of supporters to “please clap” during his abortive run in the 2016 Republican primary. 
“If we have two empty seats, you know what’s gonna happen?” 
Trump went on. 
“The fake news is gonna say, he didn’t fill out the arena.” 
The Daily Beast has contacted Wilkins’ representatives for comment on this story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.4%Will Neal: 4.7%The Daily Beast: 4.5%Confirmation Bias9.4%This article: 1.7%Will Neal: 0.2%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Anchoring Bias1.7%This article: 12.0%Will Neal: 2.3%The Daily Beast: 3.6%Availability Heuristic12.0%This article: 5.3%Will Neal: 0.7%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.3%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Will Neal: 16.2%The Daily Beast: 11.2%Framing Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.8%Will Neal: 0.9%The Daily Beast: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Will Neal: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Pessimism Bias3.8%This article: 46.5%Will Neal: 24.9%The Daily Beast: 19.9%Negativity Bias46.5%This article: 18.3%Will Neal: 5.7%The Daily Beast: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias18.3%This article: 3.9%Will Neal: 4.4%The Daily Beast: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error3.9%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.7%The Daily Beast: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 1.4%The Daily Beast: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Will Neal: 1.5%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Recency Bias1.7%This article: 5.6%Will Neal: 0.8%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Primacy Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Will Neal: 5.3%The Daily Beast: 5.1%Ad Hominem9.4%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.0%Will Neal: 0.3%The Daily Beast: 1.1%False Dilemma2.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 4.4%Will Neal: 0.6%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Circular Reasoning4.4%This article: 13.8%Will Neal: 3.7%The Daily Beast: 6.4%Hasty Generalization13.8%This article: 5.5%Will Neal: 0.8%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Red Herring5.5%This article: 0.3%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Bandwagon0.3%This article: 10.8%Will Neal: 4.7%The Daily Beast: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion10.8%This article: 5.5%Will Neal: 1.6%The Daily Beast: 1.0%Begging the Question5.5%This article: 12.1%Will Neal: 2.5%The Daily Beast: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.1%This article: 0.8%Will Neal: 0.1%The Daily Beast: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.8%This article: 2.6%Will Neal: 0.7%The Daily Beast: 1.4%Burden of Proof2.6%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.2%Will Neal: 1.6%The Daily Beast: 3.8%Anecdotal11.2%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%Will Neal: 0.7%The Daily Beast: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 8.5%Will Neal: 1.2%The Daily Beast: 0.2%Special Pleading8.5%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.5%The Daily Beast: 4.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.6%Will Neal: 3.3%The Daily Beast: 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 37.3%Will Neal: 28.3%The Daily Beast: 18.3%Biased Writer Voice37.3%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 5.5%Will Neal: 6.3%The Daily Beast: 3.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.5%This article: 3.3%Will Neal: 0.9%The Daily Beast: 0.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Will Neal: 0.0%The Daily Beast: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

660 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers34%attributed speech433writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageSara Higdon • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageAlexis Wilkins • 36 words • 100.0% coverageAlexis Wilkins • 56 words • 0.0% coverageNOTUS • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAlexis Wilkins • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 36 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageThe Daily Beast • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sara Higdon

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words7.5% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +98.8 ptsWriter: 1.2%Sara Higdon: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-41.8 ptsWriter: 41.8%Sara Higdon: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Sara Higdon: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.9 ptsWriter: 0.9%Sara Higdon: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.