Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Victoria Moorwood results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 160 hits . Analysis detected 507 faulty-reasoning hits from 894 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Victoria Moorwood is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Victoria Moorwood
Author details
Total words: 894
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles894 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 17.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst