Author summary
3% 2 analyzed articles/videos 564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria E. Freile results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 75 hits . Analysis detected 396 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,256 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (8,021 of 8,969 authors). This Victoria E. Freile is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Victoria E. Freile
Author details
Total words: 2,256
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.6% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst