Publication summary
4% 17 analyzed articles/videos 6,761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rockland/Westchester Journal News results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 822 hits . Analysis detected 7,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,463 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (550 of 564 publications). This Rockland/Westchester Journal News is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Rockland/Westchester Journal News Publication details
Total words: 27,463
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 0.6% BS Score17 analyzed articles27.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.0% 0.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst