Author summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanessa Swales results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Recency Bias , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 55 hits . Analysis detected 187 faulty-reasoning hits from 684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,755 of 9,128 authors). This Vanessa Swales is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Vanessa Swales
Author details
Total words: 684
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles684 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.1% 6.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst