Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tribune Editorial Board results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 260 hits . Analysis detected 1,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,076 of 9,097 authors). This Tribune Editorial Board is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. Tribune Editorial Board
Author details
Total words: 2,328
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst