Author summary
46% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Newsroom results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 637 hits . Analysis detected 4,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,768 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,500 of 6,260 authors). This Texas Newsroom is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Texas Newsroom
Author details
Total words: 6,768
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst