Author summary
ā 67% 1 analyzed article/video 635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Osier Lindley results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 308 hits . Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,905 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ā 72% (1,805 of 6,360 authors). This Rachel Osier Lindley is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Rachel Osier Lindley
Author details
Total words: 1,905
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 16.2% 16.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 16.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst