Author summary
8%2 analyzed articles/videos993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savannah Peters Associated Press results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,972 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (8,010 of 9,130 authors). This Savannah Peters Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Savannah Peters Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
13%Savannah Peters Associated Press (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,972
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

12% percentile
025507510012.3% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos