Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SARAH EL DEEB results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,456 hits . Analysis detected 8,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,887 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,792 of 6,263 authors). This SARAH EL DEEB is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. SARAH EL DEEB
Author details
Total words: 10,887
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst