Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These LEE KEATH results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 992 hits . Analysis detected 5,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,435 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,202 of 6,603 authors). This LEE KEATH is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. LEE KEATH
Author details
Total words: 6,435
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.4% 15.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.8% 6.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst