Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Dorn results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 719 hits. Analysis detected 2,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,528 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,372 of 6,530 authors). This Sara Dorn is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Sara Dorn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
79%Sara Dorn (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,528
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 28.4%28.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 28.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 26.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos