Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruth Sherlock results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 763 hits . Analysis detected 4,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,245 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,085 of 6,628 authors). This Ruth Sherlock is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Ruth Sherlock
Author details
Total words: 3,245
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.6% percentile 5.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 16.4% 16.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 23.5% 23.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 16.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst