Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Durrie Bouscaren results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 596 hits . Analysis detected 2,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of 97% (250 of 6,628 authors). This Durrie Bouscaren is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. Durrie Bouscaren
Author details
Total words: 1,022
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.2% percentile 12.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 58.3% 58.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 28.8% 28.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 35.4% 35.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 25.9% 25.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 27.0% 27.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 17.1% 17.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 58.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 35.4%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 28.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 27.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 25.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst