Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuha Musleh results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 312 hits . Analysis detected 2,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,223 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,573 of 6,628 authors). This Nuha Musleh is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Nuha Musleh
Author details
Total words: 2,223
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.3% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.0% 14.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst