Author summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Crimmins results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 370 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,242 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (857 of 8,876 authors). This Peter Crimmins is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Peter Crimmins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠91%Peter Crimmins (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,242
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510090.4% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos