WHYY24%

BlackStar Film Festival marks 15 years of championing filmmakers of color 11%

By Peter Crimmins19%

8/5/2026, 3:00:21 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 618 faulty-reasoning hits from 414 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of 11% (24,945 of 28,004 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the article peer group.

From Philly and the Pa. suburbs to South Jersey and Delaware, what would you like WHYY News to cover? 
Let us know! 
The BlackStar Film Festival, marking its 15th anniversary this week, has grown from an experiment in the filmmaker community into a national model for arts organizations serving communities of color. 
Across four days, this year’s festival will screen 91 films at 10 venues, including a feature about a journey on foot through Haiti by a returning son and a local boy who tags along; a 10-hour documentary cycle by the renowned filmmaker Haile Gerima about the Italian occupation of Ethiopia; and an experimental film about religious experience set in South Africa. 
The full list of films is available online, but what has made BlackStar a uniquely essential festival for 15 years is not visible on the schedule. 
“BlackStar is not just a screening venue. 
It’s really people coming together,” said Louis Massiah, founder of Philadelphia’s Scribe Video Center. 
“Yes, we’re going there to see films, but the conversations that happen after the film are as important as the screening,” he said. 
“Not just the conversations that happen within the theater, but the conversations that happen in the lobby and on the street.” 
The festival will include the theatrical premiere of his film “Tenants of Lenapehoking in the Age of Magnets ,” an experimental film based on oral histories of North Philadelphia residents. 
An archival still from “Tenants of Lenapehoking in the Age of Magnets,” an experimental documentary about residents of North Philadelphia by Louis Massiah. 
(Provided by Louis Massiah) 
BlackStar founder Maori Karmael Holmes, a former filmmaker herself, built the festival with filmmakers’ needs in mind. 
In 2005, Holmes took her debut feature documentary “Scene Not Heard,” about Philadelphia women hip-hop artists, on the festival circuit and forged relationships with other filmmakers. 
“This was around the same time that Facebook had opened up to nonstudents,” she said. 
“Relationships you make on the road, you’re actually carrying with you because you’re keeping up with people online.” 
Holmes thought: Why can’t there be a festival specifically designed to foster relationships among artists? 
“Many of our team are filmmakers, and we’ve always said filmmakers are our audience first,” Holmes said. 
“In concentric circles, it’s filmmakers, and then we go out to the wider audience. 
We made this festival for us, so we continue to think about: What is it that we’re interested in seeing?” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.1%Anchoring Bias3.6%This article: 14.7%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.5%Availability Heuristic14.7%This article: 7.2%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic7.2%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Peter Crimmins: 8.1%WHYY: 4.0%Framing Effect9.7%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.2%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.5%Status Quo Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.7%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 3.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Peter Crimmins: 10.1%WHYY: 1.0%In-Group Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Peter Crimmins: 3.8%WHYY: 0.7%Halo Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.8%Recency Bias6.3%This article: 2.7%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.2%Primacy Effect2.7%This article: 6.3%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.1%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.3%Appeal to Authority4.1%This article: 3.6%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.1%False Dilemma3.6%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.3%Peter Crimmins: 2.4%WHYY: 2.1%Hasty Generalization4.3%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 6.3%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.4%Begging the Question6.3%This article: 6.3%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.3%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.2%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.3%Anecdotal7.2%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.6%Unattributed Quote1.7%This article: 1.7%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 13.5%Peter Crimmins: 5.4%WHYY: 1.0%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 14.5%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.3%Indoctrination14.5%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Peter Crimmins: 0.0%WHYY: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.7%

414 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers38%attributed speech257writer words
Selected voice

Maori Karmael Holmes

100%flagged-word coverage
99 attributed words63% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Indoctrination+37.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Maori Karmael Holmes: 37.4%37.4%Biased Writer Voice-0.8 ptsWriter: 16.0%Maori Karmael Holmes: 15.2%15.2%Unattributed Quote-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Maori Karmael Holmes: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Maori Karmael Holmes: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%Maori Karmael Holmes: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.