Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OPB results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,829 hits . Analysis detected 6,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,659 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,459 of 6,629 authors). This OPB is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. OPB
Author details
Total words: 6,659
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.5% 27.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.3% 21.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 27.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 21.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst