Author summary
23% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erik Neumann results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 515 hits . Analysis detected 4,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,018 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,876 of 6,162 authors). This Erik Neumann is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Erik Neumann
Author details
Total words: 6,018
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst