Longview, WA superintendent arrested on obstruction charges for high school sexual assault investigation 2%

By Erik Neumann24% OPB0%

5/22/2026, 6:38:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Burden of Proof, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 995 faulty-reasoning hits from 544 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (20,872 of 21,175 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the article peer group.

Longview Public Schools Superintendent Karen Cloninger was arrested by Longview police Thursday morning on charges related to obstructing an ongoing investigation into student sexual assault at Mark Morris High School. 
The Longview Police Department said that district leadership learned of physical and sexual misconduct allegations as early as Jan. 
29, 2026. 
Law enforcement staff contacted Cloninger in early February, to ask whether assistance was needed, but were informed the issue was being handled internally. 
Employees with the district raised concerns about mandatory reporting obligations and whether law enforcement should be contacted, according to a statement Longview police released on Thursday. 
“Investigators developed information alleging employees were directed by Cloninger to handle the matter internally and discourage further discussion regarding the incident,” the statement read. 
Cloninger was put on administrative leave during an emergency meeting of the school board Thursday, district officials said. 
“As a school district, we take our responsibility to protect the safety and care of our students very seriously. 
The allegations described by law enforcement are serious and troubling,” Acting Superintendent Patti Bowen wrote in a statement. 
“Our district remains committed to understanding the facts surrounding the alleged student and staff misconduct, cooperating with the ongoing investigation, following the law, and ultimately taking appropriate accountability action.” 
Mark Morris High School has been the focus of an investigation into sexual assault allegations between players on the school’s varsity basketball team and at least four junior varsity members since February. 
The allegations include a series of incidents where younger players were forcibly dragged into a school locker room and harassed or sexually assaulted by older players. 
Police incident reports describe hazing incidents that got out of control. 
Cloninger faces one felony charge of tampering with a witness, and two gross misdemeanor charges: failure to report and obstructing a law enforcement officer. 
Cloninger started as superintendent of Longview Public Schools in February 2024. 
Thursday’s statement from the Longview Police Department did not elaborate on the charges, but past police investigation records describe a search of Cloninger’s personal cellphone. 
Those records, obtained by OPB through a public records request, note that the device was used to discuss allegations about the Mark Morris case and messages were deleted from Cloninger’s cellphone. 
“Based off the above information it appears Karen Cloninger is conducting Longview School District business related messages on her devices and emails and likely deleting public information,” wrote Longview Police Det. 
R. 
Gibbs in the March 5, 2026, incident report. 
The reports also describe situations in early February in which district administrative staff discussed mandatory reporting related to the allegations but determined that “they were not obligated to report at that time.” 
Additional charges are forthcoming for Andrew Schoonover, the executive director of student services for Longview Public Schools, according to Thursday’s police statement. 
The two gross misdemeanor charges include failure to report and making a false or misleading statement to a public servant. 
A court case involving two of the varsity players is expected to take place in July. 
The teens accused in the investigation have been charged with second degree rape, unlawful imprisonment with sexual motivation, indecent liberties with forcible compulsion, and indecent exposure. 
This story was originally published by OPB. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.6%Erik Neumann: 3.3%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias15.6%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 3.8%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Erik Neumann: 3.7%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.6%This article: 5.9%Erik Neumann: 2.8%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.6%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 1.7%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.5%Erik Neumann: 7.5%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect23.5%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.5%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.9%Erik Neumann: 0.7%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%Erik Neumann: 7.0%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias5.3%This article: 3.3%Erik Neumann: 2.2%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias3.3%This article: 36.6%Erik Neumann: 8.6%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias36.6%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.1%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.9%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 2.7%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 1.2%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Erik Neumann: 0.4%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.5%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.0%Erik Neumann: 6.6%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority14.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 1.8%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.2%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.0%Erik Neumann: 3.0%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization4.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 2.8%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.3%Erik Neumann: 6.7%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion5.3%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.2%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.6%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 17.3%Erik Neumann: 1.6%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof17.3%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.8%Erik Neumann: 1.4%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal4.8%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.3%Erik Neumann: 1.6%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.3%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.4%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.4%Erik Neumann: 1.7%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 11.0%Erik Neumann: 2.8%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice11.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.8%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erik Neumann: 0.0%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

544 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers38%attributed speech335writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageLongview Police Department • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageLongview Police Department • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePatti Bowen • 18 words • 0.0% coveragePatti Bowen • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLongview Police Department • 25 words • 0.0% coverageOPB • 31 words • 0.0% coverageR. Gibbs • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageR. Gibbs • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageLongview Police Department • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

R. Gibbs

79%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words19% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Biased Writer Voice+79.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%R. Gibbs: 79.5%79.5%Quote-first Misdirection-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%R. Gibbs: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.