Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Palombo results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 1,863 hits . Analysis detected 13,563 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,181 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (971 of 6,359 authors). This Olivia Palombo is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Olivia Palombo
Author details
Total words: 8,181
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.7% percentile 5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 16.2% 16.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.8% 22.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.7% 13.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst