Author summary
⁠22%3 analyzed articles/videos733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Catoggio results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 2,701 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,859 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (2,287 of 6,359 authors). This Nick Catoggio is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Nick Catoggio
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠64%Nick Catoggio (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,859
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.7%14.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos