Graham Platner Tries To Take Democrats Hostage - The Dispatch 11%

By Nick Catoggio22%

7/8/2026, 9:28:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 327 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,064 of 21,203 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the article peer group.

value && $store.iterable.getIterableUser()); 
= 3 && ageInMonths 3 months old . 
Some information may be outdated.'; 
} else if (ageInMonths >= 6 && ageInMonths 6 months old . 
Some information may be outdated.'; 
} else if (ageInMonths >= 12 && ageInMonths 1 year old . 
Some information may be outdated.'; 
} else if (ageInMonths >= 12) { 
const ageInYears = Math.floor(ageInMonths / 12); 
this.message = `This post is more than ${ageInYears} ${ageInYears === 1 ? 
'year' : 'years'} old . 
Some information may be outdated. 
`; 
this.tooltipOpen = false; 
Turn any article into a podcast. 
Upgrade now to start listening. 
Members can share articles with friends & family to bypass the paywall. 
You’re reading Boiling Frogs , Nick Catoggio’s daily newsletter on politics. 
To unlock the full version, become a Dispatch member today . 
Editor’s Note: Over the next few evenings, we will be migrating to a new commenting platform, possibly resulting in temporary outages to the commenting feature. 
Nick Catoggio is a staff writer at The Dispatch and is based in Texas. 
Prior to joining the company in 2022, he spent 16 years gradually alienating a populist readership at Hot Air. 
When Nick isn’t busy writing a daily newsletter on politics, he’s  probably planning the next day’s newsletter. 
0 && $store.user.loaded" 
x-transition:enter="transition-transform ease-out duration-300" 
x-transition:enter-start="translate-y-full" 
x-transition:enter-end="translate-y-0" 
x-transition:leave="transition-transform ease-in duration-300" 
x-transition:leave-start="translate-y-0" 
x-transition:leave-end="translate-y-full" 
class="fixed bg-blue-midnight bottom-0 left-0 w-full py-4 z-modal-content border-t border-red-warm"> 
{ if (opened) $nextTick(() => $refs.giftRecipientNameInput?.focus()) })" 
class="relative w-full max-w-md md:max-w-lg rounded-xl bg-white shadow-xl max-h-[90vh] overflow-y-auto" 
Gift this article to a friend 
Checking gift availability... 
Unlimited gift links 
gift links remaining this month 
You've used all your gift links this month 
Upgrade to Premium for unlimited gift links 
The Audacity of Cope 
Click the button below to copy the article link to your clipboard. 
{ if (opened) $nextTick(() => $refs.shareEmailInput?.focus()) })" 
class="relative w-full max-w-md rounded-xl bg-white shadow-xl" 
Share this article via email 
Email sent successfully! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 4.9%The Dispatch: 3.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 4.7%The Dispatch: 1.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.9%The Dispatch: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Nick Catoggio: 3.6%The Dispatch: 4.8%Framing Effect3.4%This article: 8.0%Nick Catoggio: 2.5%The Dispatch: 0.8%Loss Aversion8.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Nick Catoggio: 0.6%The Dispatch: 1.6%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 2.8%The Dispatch: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Nick Catoggio: 10.9%The Dispatch: 5.3%Negativity Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 1.3%The Dispatch: 0.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.9%The Dispatch: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 1.6%The Dispatch: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.9%The Dispatch: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 3.4%The Dispatch: 1.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 1.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.3%Nick Catoggio: 0.5%The Dispatch: 3.7%Appeal to Authority4.3%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 1.6%The Dispatch: 2.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 1.6%The Dispatch: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 7.2%The Dispatch: 5.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.2%Nick Catoggio: 2.1%The Dispatch: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion1.2%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 3.1%The Dispatch: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.9%The Dispatch: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.5%Nick Catoggio: 2.2%The Dispatch: 1.1%Anecdotal5.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 1.1%The Dispatch: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.6%The Dispatch: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.6%The Dispatch: 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.0%The Dispatch: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 14.7%The Dispatch: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 0.9%The Dispatch: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 2.4%The Dispatch: 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Catoggio: 1.0%The Dispatch: 1.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.2%Nick Catoggio: 14.9%The Dispatch: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…20.2%

327 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.4%attributed speech306writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
The Dispatch • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageThe Dispatch • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Dispatch

52%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words100% of attributed speech36% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +34.4 ptsWriter: 18.0%The Dispatch: 52.4%52.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.