Author summary
11%2 analyzed articles/videos270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Womack results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 404 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,220 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,684 of 9,005 authors). This Morgan Womack is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Morgan Womack
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
60%Morgan Womack (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,220
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.5%2.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos