Author summary
28%3 analyzed articles/videos1,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Phillips results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,030 hits. Analysis detected 3,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,782 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 25% (6,695 of 8,840 authors). This Michael Phillips is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Michael Phillips
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
25%Michael Phillips (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,782
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.7%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos