Author summary
17%3 analyzed articles/videos1,989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Busse results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 493 hits. Analysis detected 3,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,754 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (8,045 of 8,785 authors). This Matt Busse is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Matt Busse
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
9%Matt Busse (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,754
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751008.4% percentile
1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate