Author summary
31%2 analyzed articles/videos704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary Ellen McIntire results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 237 hits. Analysis detected 1,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (7,516 of 9,336 authors). This Mary Ellen McIntire is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Mary Ellen McIntire
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
20%Mary Ellen McIntire (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Tu Quoque: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos