Author summary
7%3 analyzed articles/videos94 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Reynolds results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,612 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,657 of 8,821 authors). This Mark Reynolds is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Mark Reynolds
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
48%Mark Reynolds (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,612
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510047.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate