Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Mazzetti results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,384 hits . Analysis detected 8,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,389 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,934 of 6,628 authors). This Mark Mazzetti is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Mark Mazzetti
Author details
Total words: 7,389
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst